is a purposeful process of education and training in the interests of the individual, society and the state, accompanied by a statement of the educational achievement of the educational state (educational qualifications) established by the state. The level of education is determined by the requirements of production, the state of science, technology and culture, as well as social relations.
Now where do not look everywhere people with higher education, and even with two or three. That’s only necessary to see what actually gave them this education. After all, most often it turns out that a person has studied for five years in one specialty, and works for another. It turns out the person has deceived himself, you can say he lost five years of his life. To prevent this, it is necessary to remove the “rose-colored glasses” and see the reality. Therefore, it is necessary to debunk student myths.
Diploma – a ticket to a bright future.
Today many seek to obtain higher education. But the very term “higher education” for the majority means getting a diploma, not knowledge. It is believed that the main thing is to get the cherished crust and everything – a bright future in your pocket, but this is not so. Today in our country a whole army of graduates who can not find a job by profession. They can not even because their specialty is not in demand, but because they are such “specialists” in their business.
You do not need to learn everything, you will learn in practice.
Often in the student’s environment it is considered that only 20-30% of the knowledge obtained at the university will be useful in practice. This is mistake. Ask any graduate of the institute or university who did not particularly try to study in the student years and he will tell you that he regrets that he did not teach the theory that he had to teach everything that was taught and even more.
You need to choose a prestigious specialty, regardless of abilities.
Applicants and especially their parents believe that you must definitely choose a prestigious specialty, for example go to law school, let your daughter have a natural inclination to paint – it’s not important, the main thing is to choose a monetary profession. This is an erroneous assumption. Firstly, a person who went to study in a field that is not interesting for him will learn through strength, or he will not learn at all. Secondly, in the future, in life, the greatest success can be achieved only in the field that is interesting.
The teacher, if he wants, will “overwhelm”.
Many students, not having passed the test or the exam, are inclined to blame the teacher for everything, they say, he “piled up” his poor fellow. In fact, everything is different. Here it is necessary to remember one thing: if the student actually knows the subject on “5”, then no one, even the most quirky teacher, will ever “overwhelm”, even if he tries very hard. In any case, it is always possible to file an appeal and pass the examination of the commission, if you are sure of your knowledge.
Lecture notes are sufficient.
Lectures are just a work plan. The lectures give only the very basics to guide the student along the right path. The student can get the real knowledge only himself. After all, the very word “student” from Latin is translated as self-learning. Lectures give at best only 10-20% of knowledge, and the rest is in the library.
The first two years of hooliganism, and then I’ll start to learn.
The program of study in higher educational institutions is structured so that the first two years are taught general subjects (history, history, safety, etc.). It seems that they should not be particularly zealous, but there is one important point: how to show yourself the first year or two, so to you and will be treated until the end of school. As they say the first two years the student works on a student’s record-book, the other three (from someone four) the student’s record-book works for the student.
In bad knowledge, a bad teacher is to blame.
Getting to work yesterday’s graduate understands that his knowledge is not enough for normal work, does not understand what and how to do. He thinks that it was badly taught him.No, just as it was mentioned above – the teacher can give the student at best only 20% of the necessary knowledge, the rest must be obtained by himself.
Practice is not needed.
The training program is structured so that during the training only a theory is given that is necessary, but not sufficient. For example, a law student is taught what a contract is, what it should contain – all this is described in detail in the textbooks, but if he has never seen the contract in person and did not try to create it, then this specialist will not be able to provide quality services to his client. Therefore pralllno to study it is necessary to practice there where you are going to go to work.
To earn a lot of money, knowledge is not needed.
Perhaps this was in the nineties of the last century, when all rushed to trade, but now everything is different. To qualify for a good job, you need quality knowledge. Why does the director of the company have a bad manager because of which the firm will incur losses and not receive profit, here even the blat will not help.
I will study only to become a good specialist.
There is another side to the coin, when a person goes to school – they are usually called “botanists”. So you can not become an excellent “master of your business”, because a good specialist should not only know his subject, but also be able to communicate with people, be athletic, he must have many friends and acquaintances. It is necessary to attend various events in order to keep abreast of developments and to know what is going on outside the window.